The National Asthma Council Logo

 

 

Leading the attack against asthma

Search website
Home About the NAC Strategy Managing Asthma Research Emergency
 
Asthma information Papers
 
Asthma Management Handbook Asthma Action Plans Spirometry Resources  Other Resources Information Papers Special Topics Professional Development  

Asthma Information Papers

Allergic rhinitis and the patient with asthma
Treat allergic rhinitis to manage asthma
Diagnosis
Patterns of allergic rhinitis
Management I
Management II
Management III
Management IV
Review
Levels of evidences
References
Content created Sep 2006
Content updated Sep 2006


Get Adobe Reader

Get Adobe Flash Player

 

NextBackManagement I

Advise patients not to smoke and to avoid environmental tobacco smoke. Smoking may worsen both asthma and rhinitis, and impair effectiveness of treatment.2

Allergen avoidance

Before considering trigger avoidance strategies, confirm the diagnosis and confirm that the particular allergen is a significant trigger for the individual by both allergy testing and history.

Grass pollens

While pollen avoidance measures such as sealing the home against outside air and the use of face masks or glasses are sometimes advocated, these are impractical in Australian environments and generally unacceptable to patients.

House dust mite

The house dust mite is a very common allergen source in humid areas of Australia, and avoidance by allergic individuals is intuitively reasonable. However, there is no definitive evidence from well-designed studies to indicate which strategies effectively reduce allergen load or improve allergic rhinitis and asthma.20,21 Measures that have consistently been reported effective in reducing mite exposure include hot (>55 degrees C) washing of all bedding and the use of mite-proof cases for mattresses and pillows.20 <Level II> Patients should be warned that house dust mite avoidance measures can be expensive and time consuming, and may not be effective in individuals.

Pet allergens

For patients with demonstrated allergy to cats or other pets, allergic symptoms are highly unlikely to be adequately controlled while the pet remains in the house. After removal of a pet, thorough cleaning of walls and floorings should be undertaken to remove adherent allergens. Allergic symptoms may not resolve promptly despite these measures. Recognise that psychosocial factors will affect patients’ decisions about existing pets.

Indoor and outdoor moulds

There is insufficient evidence to indicate effective measures for avoiding exposure to indoor and outdoor mould allergens, or that avoidance attempts can improve symptoms or allergy and asthma.

 
 Practice points
  • Don’t recommend allergen avoidance measures to patients unless the allergen is known be a significant contributor to symptoms, as demonstrated by allergy testing that has been expertly performed and interpreted.

  • Advise patients with known pet allergy not to acquire a pet. If patients choose to keep existing pets, they should be kept outside. Warn patients that allergen exposure and symptoms may persist after removal, and that frequent washing of pets is ineffective and may be harmful to pets.

  • High-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter vacuum cleaners may remove more allergen than other vacuum cleaners, but there is no evidence that they are effective in controlling allergic rhinitis or asthma.

  • Acaracide sprays, home dehumidifiers and air cleaning devices are not recommended in the control of allergic symptoms. For detailed advice on allergen avoidance, refer to the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (www.allergy.org.au)

 

Consider nasal irrigation

Nasal irrigation is an effective technique for managing allergic rhinitis in adults and children, possibly due to enhanced ciliary function or removal of inflammatory cytokines via mucus clearance.22 Various methods are suitable, including use of pre-packaged nasal sprays and introduction of saline solutions via rinse bottles. Suitable solutions include commercially manufactured saline solutions and home-made normal saline (4.5 g of common salt added to 500 mL of boiled water; approximately 1 teaspoon per 600 mL/1 pint). There is limited evidence to indicate whether solutions should be hypertonic or isotonic, buffered or non-buffered, sterile or non-sterile, or whether various additives provide any advantage. There is insufficient evidence to recommend that patients use steam or an irritant decongestant (e.g. eucalyptus, menthol) prior to saline irrigation.

When nasal irrigations are to be used frequently, patients are more likely to adhere to simple and convenient regimens than those requiring complex procedures, regardless of theoretical advantages.22

Top of page