 Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 1
Summary of evidence for the efficacy of
montelukast in children with each clinical pattern
of asthma
|
|
Author |
Design |
Key findings |
|
Persistent asthma |
|
Randomised placebo-controlled trials
|
Knorr
et al., 200113
|
Montelukast
4 mg once daily at bedtime for 12 weeks
in pre-school children with
mild-to-moderate persistent asthma
(n=689) |
Montelukast
superior to placebo on: percentage
asthma-free days, daytime asthma
symptoms, night-time asthma symptoms,
days with asthma symptoms, need for SABA
or oral corticosteroids, physician's
global evaluation
No significant difference vs placebo
in exacerbations rate, caregiver's
global evaluation, quality of life
Benefits observed from first day
No difference vs placebo in adverse
event rate |
| Knorr
et al., 199814
Becker et al., 200417
|
Montelukast
5 mg once daily at bedtime for 8 weeks
in school children with persistent
asthma (n=336)
Included children with moderately
severe (FEV150-85% predicted) asthma
One-third taking ICS |
Montelukast
superior to placebo on: FEV1improvement,
SABA use, days with asthma exacerbations
(21% vs 26%), quality of life
No significant difference vs placebo
on: absenteeism from school, nocturnal
awakening, daytime asthma symptom score.
Onset of action rapid and sustained
No difference vs placebo in adverse
event rate
In subgroup with milder asthma (FEV1>
75% predicted), montelukast superior to
placebo on: FEV1improvement, PEF,
night-time wakening, quality of life
|
|
Phipatanakul et al., 200242
|
School
children with asthma triggered by
exposure to cat allergens (n=18)
|
Montelukast
superior on: FEV1response to allergen
exposure, duration of challenge
tolerated
No significant difference vs placebo
for upper respiratory
response |
|
Phipatanakul et al., 200343
|
24-week
trial of montelukast during planned ICS
tapering in children with
stable persistent asthma taking
low-to-moderate ICS doses (n=36) |
Montelukast
superior to placebo on: number of
rescue-free days, ICS dose reduction
achieved
ICS requirement increased in placebo
control group |
|
Randomised
comparative trials
|
Garcia
Garcia
et al., 200516
|
Montelukast
5 mg once daily vs
fluticasone 100 mcg twice daily in
school children with mild persistent
asthma for 12 months (n=994)
Designed to demonstrate
non-inferiority for primary outcome:
change
from baseline in % days free of
rescue
medications (e.g. SABA, systemic
corticosteroids) |
Montelukast
not inferior to ICS on primary outcome
Fluticasone superior on: FEV1, days
without SABA, quality of life, systemic
corticosteroid requirement, acute asthma
episodes
Both montelukast and fluticasone well
tolerated |
| Luskin
et al.,
200319
|
Montelukast
vs fluticasone in school
children with mild persistent asthma
(n=104)
12-month prospective open-label
observational study |
Montelukast
and fluticasone equally effective on:
emergency visits, hospitalisation,
symptoms at study completion, SABA use,
oral prednisolone use.
Montelukast superior on adherence |
| Sorkness
et al., 200720 |
Montelukast
once daily vs fluticasone 100 mcg twice
daily for 48 weeks in school children
with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma
|
Fluticasone
superior on: symptom-free days, SABA
use, improvement in number of asthma
control days, improvement in
episode-free days, FEV1, morning and
evening PEF
No difference for growth over 48
weeks |
| Zeiger
et al., 200621
|
Montelukast
vs fluticasone for 16 weeks in school
children with mild-to- moderate
persistent asthma |
Fluticasone
superior to montelukast on: number of
asthma control days, Asthma Control
Questionnaire,
SABA use, FEV1, peak
expiratory flow |
| Ostrom
et al., 200522
|
Montelukast
5 mg once daily vs fluticasone 50 mcg
twice daily for 12 weeks in school
children (n=342) with moderate-to-severe
persistent asthma (baseline FEV160-85%
predicted) |
Fluticasone
superior to montelukast on: FEV1,
morning and evening PEF, percentage
rescue-free days, night-time symptom
score, mean total symptom score, SABA
use |
| Jat et
al., 200623 |
Combination
montelukast 5 mg once + budesonide 200
mcg daily vs budesonide 400 mcg/day
alone in children with moderate
persistent asthma |
Similar
efficacy on: FEV1, asthma symptom scores
Budesonide 400 mcg/day markedly superior
to montelukast plus low-dose budesonide
on exacerbation rate (33.3% vs 9.1%; P <
0.01) |
| Peroni
et al.,
200544 |
Montelukast
vs budesonide in children with mild
asthma exposed to known allergen trigger
(house dust mite) |
Both
budesonide and montelukast protected
against fall in FEV1on allergen
challenge Budesonide, but not
montelukast, protected against increase
in bronchial hyperresponsiveness after
allergen challenge |
|
Intermittent asthma |
|
Randomised placebo-controlled trials
|
Bisgaard
et al., 200325 |
Long-term
(12 months) montelukast in pre-school
children with intermittent asthma and a
history of recurrent viral-induced
exacerbations taking ICS (n=549) |
Montelukast
superior to placebo on: exacerbation
rate, ICS requirement Number of positive
viral tests too low to permit
correlation of reduction exacerbations
with prevention of viral-induced
episodes |
| Robertson
et al., 20073
|
12-month
study of parent-initiated montelukast
course commenced at onset of viral
infection or asthma symptoms in school
children with intermittent asthma |
Montelukast
superior to placebo on: reduction in
symptoms, days off school, need for
doctor visits Non-significant trend
favouring montelukast for: specialist
attendances and hospitalisations,
duration of episode, SABA use,
prednisolone use |
| Bisgaard
et al.,
200345
|
28-day
course montelukast in infants
(3-36 months) hospitalised with acute
RSV bronchiolitis |
Montelukast
superior to placebo on: proportion of
symptom-free days and nights, cough
rate, delayed acute respiratory episodes
|
|
Exercise-induced asthma |
|
Randomised placebo- controlled trials |
Melo et
al.,
200330
|
Montelukast
taken for 1 week in
atopic school children with exercise-
induced bronchoconstriction
|
Montelukast
superior to placebo on: reduction in
immediate-phase and late-phase
bronchoconstriction
following exercise challenge
Montelukast abolished late-phase
bronchoconstriction |
| Kemp et
al.,
199831 |
Montelukast
5 mg once daily in school
children |
Montelukast
superior to placebo on protection
against
exercise-induced bronchoconstriction
Protective effect seen after 2 days'
treatment |
| Kim et
al.,
200532
|
Montelukast
taken for 8 weeks in
children with exercise-induced asthma
(n=64) |
Montelukast
superior to placebo on protection
against
exercise-induced bronchoconstriction
Bronchoprotective effect sustained
for 8 weeks after cessation of treatment
|

Appendix 2
Search Strategy
A. Medline 1996 to Present with Daily Update
(Ovid) Search strategy:
1 montelukast.mp. [mp=title, original title,
abstract, name of substance word, subject heading
word] (843)
2 leukotriene receptor antagonist$.mp. [mp=title,
original title, abstract, name of substance word,
subject heading word] (784)
3 1 or 2 (1373)
4 limit 3 to (humans and English language and
(clinical trial, all or guideline or meta analysis
or practice guideline or randomized controlled trial
or “review”)) (590)
B. Medline 1996 to Present with Daily Update
(Ovid)
Search strategy:
1 Asthma, Exercise-Induced/ (1313)
2 montelukast.mp. [mp=title, original title,
abstract, name of substance word, subject heading
word] (846)
3 1 and 2 (32)
C. Pubmed clinical queries
1 montelukast + therapy + narrow (specific) (249)
2 Limit 1 to: (human + English + [meta-analysis
or RTC] + age 0–18 years) (141)
 |