The National Asthma Council Information Papers for Health Professionals   Leading the attack against Asthma
NAC Home  Asthma Information Brochures and Papers  
Allergy Lung Function Tests Pain Relievers Air Pollution Complementary Therapies Infant Bedding Diet in Early Childhood Wheezing in the first years of life

Asthma and Complementary Therapies

A guide for health professionals

Key Messages
Introduction
Why do people with asthma seek to use complementary therapies?  
Aims of treatment for people with asthma
Regulatory framework for complementary therapies and therapists
Information resources   
Current evidence of the effectiveness of  complementary therapies in the treatment of people with asthma
Summary of current evidence of effectiveness  of complementary therapies in the treatment of people with asthma - I
Summary of current evidence of effectiveness  of complementary therapies in the treatment of people with asthma - II
Summary of current evidence of effectiveness  of complementary therapies in the treatment of people with asthma - III
References
Content created MAR 2005
Content updated MAR 2005

Get Acrobat Reader here

NextBackKey Messages

  • There is evidence of increasing public interest in the use of complementary therapies for the treatment of medical conditions.
  • However, overall, there is less information available about the safety and effectiveness of complementary therapies than is available about mainstream pharmaceutical treatments.
  • As with any new asthma treatment, it is wise to trial a complementary therapy for a set period to determine its benefit. Following this trial a clear decision can be made to stop or continue the therapy. If a patient would like to try a complementary therapy, encourage him/her to discuss what aspect of their asthma they hope to improve and how to measure the benefit.
  • Health professionals prescribing complementary therapies should be aware of the potential for adverse effects and for interactions with pharmaceutical medicines.
  • There is no national system of registration or recognition of complementary therapy practitioners. In most States and Territories, the majority of complementary therapy practitioners are not subject to regulation.
  • Many complementary medicines carry an Australian Listing (AUST L) number issued by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

Introduction

There is evidence of widespread and increasing public interest in the use of complementary therapies (both medicines and physical therapies) for the treatment of medical conditions, including asthma. Authoritative information about these therapies, their possible benefits or adverse effects on people with asthma, is required to enable health professionals to respond to the needs of people with asthma.

This paper summarises current information from published clinical trials and systematic reviews about the effectiveness of various complementary therapies for improving symptoms and/or lung function and/or reducing medication requirements in people with asthma. This data is laid out at the end of this document in a colour-coded table.

An agreed definition of complementary therapy has not yet been developed. This paper uses a simple working definition: a complementary therapy is a therapy, including medicinal products, which is not considered to be part of current standard medical care.

The review is limited to a review of evidence of effectiveness of specific therapies that are being used as treatment for asthma in Australia. Some complementary health practices extend beyond the application to specific therapies to include non-orthodox approaches to diagnosis and, indeed, non-orthodox beliefs about the nature of illness. Assessment of the implications of these aspects of complementary therapy is beyond the scope of this review. However, practitioners should be aware of the consequences, both beneficial and potentially adverse, of diagnostic labels and therapeutic decisions made within these alternative paradigms.

Overall, there is less evidence about the effectiveness and safety of complementary therapies than there is about mainstream therapies. There is a need for well-targeted, high quality research to address the major gaps in the evidence.

Top of Page