The National Asthma Council Information Papers for Health Professionals   Leading the attack against Asthma
NAC Home  Asthma Information Brochures and Papers  
Allergy Lung Function Tests Pain Relievers Air Pollution Complementary Therapies Infant Bedding Diet in Early Childhood Wheezing in the first years of life

Asthma and Complementary Therapies

A guide for health professionals

Key Messages
Introduction
Why do people with asthma seek to use complementary therapies?  
Aims of treatment for people with asthma
Regulatory framework for complementary therapies and therapists
Information resources   
Current evidence of the effectiveness of  complementary therapies in the treatment of people with asthma
Summary of current evidence of effectiveness  of complementary therapies in the treatment of people with asthma - I
Summary of current evidence of effectiveness  of complementary therapies in the treatment of people with asthma - II
Summary of current evidence of effectiveness  of complementary therapies in the treatment of people with asthma - III
References
Content created MAR 2005
Content updated MAR 2005

Get Acrobat Reader here

NextBackSummary of current evidence of effectiveness of complementary therapies in the treatment of people with asthma - III

A  Age group (children or adults), level of severity or control, concomitant medications.
B 3+ Strong evidence for effectiveness; 3-  Strong evidence of lack of effect;
2+  Probably effective;    2-   Probably ineffective;
1+ Possibly effective;     1-  Possibly ineffective;
+/- Equivocal evidence of effect; 0    No evidence for this outcome.
C Including operator dependent, dose dependent and other adverse effects and potential interactions with other treatments.
D Includes measures of quality of life and other subjective measures of asthma control.
E In addition to the interventions listed here, there are several studies, not reviewed here, which have demonstrated that individuals with asthma and proven food chemical sensitivity benefit from avoidance of the specific food chemical(s) to which they are sensitive. There is no evidence that specific food avoidance is beneficial for people with asthma without proven food or food chemical sensitivity. Any advice on food avoidance should be given by health professionals with expertise in nutritional and dietary advice.

Therapy

Highest level of evidence available

Patient groupA

EffectivenessB

Comments

Safety considerationsC

 SymptomsD

Lung function

Medication required

Other therapies
Acupuncture (laser or fine needles used to puncture the skin at defined points)(56, 57) I: 2 systematic reviews (1 Cochrane)

 

 

+/-

+/-

+/-

Short-term studies. Questionable use of sham acupuncture as comparator. 7 trial of 174 people reviewed by Cochrane  
Hypnotherapy (creating a trance-like state)(58-63) I: Systematic review Adults and older children with severity ranging from mild-moderate/severe

 

+/-

+/-

+/-

Dependent on hypnosis ‘susceptibility’. Several published studies have not provided sufficient detail to assess effect.  
Ionisation (instrumentally boosting the positive and negative ion content of
the air)(64-68)
II: RCT Adults and children with asthma

2-

0

2-

Total N = 92 One trial demonstrated positive ionisation aggravated EIA
Meditation (techniques used to calm the mind and body)(69) II: 1 RCT Adults with ‘stable’ asthma

0

1+

0

Only half the respondents completing the
full trial.

Airways resistance decreased

 
Music therapy(70) II: 1 RCT Stable asthmatics

1+

1-

0

Data from a single trial (n = 72) with relaxation and no treatment as the comparator  
Osteopathy (physical manipulative therapy used to adjust misalignments of the muscles, joints and bones)(71, 72) II:  1 pilot RCT
and 1
controlled
comparative
study
Adults with asthma. Comparative group in second trial included
non-asthmatics

1-

+/-

0

Total number of participants = 18  
Reflexology (application of pressure, usually to the feet, to produce therapeutic effects on other parts of the body)(73, 74) II: 2 RCTs Adults with asthma

+/-

1-

+/–

(SABA
use
decreased)

Total N = 70

Peak flows increased in one study, but neither study showed improvements
in FEV1.

 

 
Speleotherapy (use of subterranean environments as a therapeutic measure)(75) I: Cochrane Review
(3 RCTs)
Children with asthma

0

1+

1+

Results may vary from cave to cave

Total N  = 118

Lung function effects were described as transient

 
Relaxation therapy(76-82) I: 1 systematic review and  other RCTs Adults and children with asthma ranging from mild to severe

2-

+/-

2-

May be of greatest benefit for those with asthma exacerbated
by anxiety.

Has also been demonstrated to be useful in acute attacks

 

Top of Page