
Combining interventions
Four cohort studies into the primary prevention of asthma currently in
progress have combined HDM avoidance with other allergen avoidance measures.69
|
The Canadian Asthma Primary Prevention
Study combined measures to reduce exposure to inhalant and food
allergens.70 All mattresses
and box springs in the parents’ and infants’ bedrooms were encased
with vapour-impermeable covers and all bedding was to be washed in
hot water weekly. Acaricides (benzyl benzoate) were also applied to
carpets and upholstery. Compliance with use of the encasings was
high and levels of HDM allergen were reduced by about one-third
(primarily due to the encasings rather than the use of benzyl
benzoate). The program resulted in a significant reduction in the
risk of asthma in high-risk children at two years.71
The Isle of Wight Study used a combination of
interventions targeting dust mite and food allergens up to nine
months of age.26 Cot
mattresses were covered with a polyvinyl impermeable cover and
carpets and upholstery in the bedroom and lounge were treated with
acaricides.72 This resulted
in a five-fold reduction of HDM antigen.26
The combined intervention has resulted in statistically significant
reductions in wheeze with bronchial hyper-responsiveness in children
aged eight years.
In the Study on the Prevention of Allergy in Children in
Europe (SPACE) house dust mite avoidance was combined with
breastfeeding or the use of hypoallergenic formulas.73
Mite allergen avoidance focused on the infant’s bed, with mattresses
being encased if they were not vinyl. Results reported at one year
showed a reduction in sensitisation to mites and also in atopy.
There was no difference in the proportion of children who had ever
wheezed.
In the Childhood Asthma Prevention Study (CAPS), an HDM
reduction intervention was combined with a dietary intervention
designed to increase dietary omega-3 fatty acids.74
The HDM reduction protocol was developed to be simple and easy to
implement on a large scale,75
using both physical and chemical methods. The mattresses of the
child’s bed or cot were covered with an impermeable cover and
parents were asked not to used sheepskins or pillows. Bedding was
washed with an acaricidal laundry additive. Adherence to the
intervention improved as the study progressed. However, 3-year
outcomes of the study showed no effect on wheeze resulting from HDM
elimination and only a small (but significant) reduction in HDM
sensitisation.76 |
Of these studies, only the CAPS is of factorial design and allows
investigators to determine which of the interventions is responsible for the
difference in clinical outcomes. Further follow-up of these studies may
provide a greater understanding of the aetiology of asthma.
The results of these trials to date suggest that a combination of
interventions may be more effective in primary prevention than single
interventions.